Pitching for a permanent 5-judge bench, the Court reasoned that resolving constitutional issues is the primary task of Judges of the Supreme Court, that must remain its core priority. Pendency of references for far too long does not reflect well on the institution.
Supreme Court observed that while the accused being a teacher, needed to be more sensitive when dealing with young students, particularly girl students, his inappropriate conduct or use of corporal punishment, in the absence of the requisite sexual intent, could not by itself justify prosecution under the stringent provisions of the POCSO Act.
Khaitan & Co. advised on Dilip Buildcon Limited’s proposed divestment of a 49% equity stake in ten special purpose vehicles to Alpha Alternatives Fund Advisors LLP, involving a 1,363 MW (AC) solar portfolio across Madhya Pradesh, with an estimated enterprise value of ₹6,829 crore.
Centre has issued a removal-of-difficulties order under the DPDP Act, 2023, clarifying consent requirements for persons with disabilities and specifying that periodic audits by Significant Data Fiduciaries are “data audits”.
Centre for Environmental Law, Advocacy & Research at National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam, invites submissions for Issue 49 onwards of Lex Terra (ISSN: 2455-0965), its quarterly online publication.
The second edition will focus on AI governance, data privacy, regulatory frameworks and practical approaches to building trustworthy AI systems. Conference to bring together participants from MeitY, the Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser, UN Global Compact, IDBI Bank, IIM Bangalore and leading technology and legal organisations
Khaitan & Co advised Autodesk Inc. on the Indian law aspects of its acquisition of select technology assets and intellectual property from BIMDeX, along with the hiring of a subset of BIMDeX’s team in India. Morrison Foerster acted as lead counsel for the transaction.
The Bar Council of Delhi stated that uncorroborated and sensational allegations made without concrete evidence can create unjustified prejudice, hinder the regular functioning of the justice delivery system and lower the dignity of courts in the eyes of the public.